You can read the published version of this article in the Fall 2010 NCAA Champion magazine.
Do you know what your team’s view of Title IX is? More than likely, they view their athletic selves as the balance for men’s athletics…and I’d say that that should not be the case. Women’s athletics stands alone as important and beneficial without the need to “balance out” athletic departments. Viewing volleyball and softball and field hockey as existing solely to enable men to play their sports and be in compliance with the law is a pretty powerless and pathetic existence.
I read a great article on the Financial Times website titled, “A Good Economist Knows the True Value of the Arts”, which talked about how the arts, hospitals, and sports try to demonstrate their relevance by selling their economic value. I’m sure you’ve heard the schpiel: women’s volleyball is helping the university by bringing families onto campus and they’re buying concessions, the concessions stand is employing workers, and the facility is able to employ more folks for maintenance and crowd control. But the author asserts that those are costs, not benefits, and that the savvy athletic director should (if it all comes down to finances) cut volleyball because the financial benefit does not come close to the financial cost taken on by the college. Here’s a great quotation from that article:
The value of an activity is not what it costs, but the amount by which its benefit exceeds its costs. The economic contribution of sport is in the pleasure participants and spectators derive, and the resulting gains in health and longevity. That value is diminished, not increased, by the resources that need to be diverted from other purposes.
So if finances aren’t the way to sell women’s athletics to our colleagues (who may silently believe that we are there for balance only) or the higher ups who are taking hard looks at the budget…what are our selling points? Where are the places that, like the quotation above says, the benefits of women’s athletics exceed its costs? There are many advantages to sports participation that will stay with its participants for life, here are a few.
Health Young ladies who participate in sports reduce their chance of getting breast cancer by 60% according to Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1994)…at a time where one in eight women have gotten or will be diagnosed with breast cancer, that’s huge! On top of that, it’s been proven that performing weight bearing exercises while young will help fight off osteoporosis later in life.
Mentors Little girls need to see that sports are for them too. They need to see that women can be aggressive and competitive and achievers…that’s where our teams come in! I don’t know about you, but I was never the stereotypical “girly girl”, wearing pink and playing with dolls, so sports participation was always a part of my life. But what if, through watching our athletes play, that stereotype shifted to include having a lacrosse stick or golf club in her hand?
Learning to excel in a team environment Go to any business magazine or read any book designed for managers and you’ll see the word “team” over and over again. The ability to strive within a team construct should be the hallmark of women’s athletics. Our athletes learn leadership, how to win and lose with grace, how to recognize strengths and weakness in themselves and others…and use those to their advantage, and how to perform under pressure. All characteristics that will serve them well after their time on our fields and courts is over.
Let’s all agree to talk to our teams about what they do and why it’s important. To explain that both men’s and women’s athletics can stand on their own respective two feet…both strong and autonomous. By doing this, we will equip them to answer the question: why women’s athletics?
What has your department done in terms of educating your student athlete population? How about education for the coaching staff? Any other ideas?